Whether work should be placed among the causes of happiness or among the causes of unhappi

B.Check the whole network and activate PW control field of PW.

C.Save configuration currently running in devices.

D.Check boot versio

A. LogicalDisk : % Free Space

B. Memory : Pages Faults/sec

C. Memory : Free System Page Table Entries

D. Server Work Queues : Queue Length

Yet multiple authorship—however good it may be in other ways--presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors？ If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review？

Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author's particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much-cited paper was really the candidate's work or a coauthor's, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.

Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame.

According to the passage, there is a tendency that scientific papers ______

A．are getting more complicated

B．are dealing with bigger problems

C．are more of a product of team work

D．are focusing more on natural than on social sciences

When items are involved in outsourcing purchase, which of the following Export Control Compliance requirements should be met？

A.通过库管员审批确认

Approved by the warehouse keeper

B.外包商发布的出口授权函

Export authorization letter issued by the subcontractor

C.查看通过包工包料或设备租赁采购的物项是否在对应的白名单清单中

Check whether the items purchased through materials or equipment lease are in the corresponding whitelist.

D.查看通过包工包料或设备租赁采购的物项是否通过采购经理审批

Check whether the items purchased through work packages or equipment lease are approved by the purchase manager.

vernment because it depends on so many different things:

whether the man is married; how many children he has; whether he supports any relations, how much interest he receives, how much he has spent on his house during the year, and so on. All this makes it Diffhcult to decide exactly how much the tax is, There was an artist who was always very careful to pay the proper amount.

One year, after posting his check as usual, he began to wonder if he had paid enough, and after a lot of work, with a pencil and paper, he found that he had not. He thought that he owed the government something.

He was just writing another check to send it to the tax collector when the postman dropped a letter into the box at the front door. Opening it, the artist was surprised to find inside it a check for five pounds from the tax collector. The offhcial explained that too much had been paid, and that therefore the difference was now returned to the taxpayer.

1.According to the passage, to decide theexact amount of tax to be paid is ().

A.simple

B.easy

C.difficult

D.interesting

2.The word“proper" in the second paragraph means ().

A.small

B.big

C.right

D.wrong

3.After a lot of work, the artist thought that he had paid the government, ().

A.less tax than he should have

B.more tax than he should have

C.as much tax as usual

D.just enough tax

4.Why did the tax collector send a letter to the artist？

A.To send him a new tax form.

B.To return the money overpaid.

C.To remind him of paying the tax.

D.To explain the rules of tax paying.

In January 2009, Amy started a business as an independent website designer.

To give her a start in her career, her brother Ben, who ran a retail business, said he would give her ￡1,000 if she updated his business website. At the same time, her friend Che asked her to do work for his business, also for a set fee of ￡1,000.

However, by the time Amy had completed the two projects her design business had become a huge success and she had lots of other clients. When Ben and Che discovered how successful Amy’s business had become they both felt that they should not be asked to pay for the work they had commissioned.

Ben said he would not pay anything as he had only offered the work to help his sister out. Che said he would not pay anything either, on the basis that he had only given her work to do on the basis of their friendship.

Required:

Advise Amy as to whether she can insist on Ben and Che paying the full amounts of their initial promises.