题目
But to make life or death decisions on behalf of a dying person unable to communicate his or her wishes is to enter a moral and legal minefield. Could a doctor be sued for withholding treatment and allowing someone to die — or for not allowing him or her to die? Could it ever be lawful to withhold food and water?
Legal moves are afoot which may settle these questions. Recently, a group on voluntary euthanasia pro- posed legislation to make documents known as "Advance Directives", or Living Wills, legally binding.
An Advance Directive sets out the kind of medical treatment a person wishes to receive, or not receive, should he or she ever be in a condition that prevents them expressing those wishes. Such documents, much in vogue in the US and some EU countries, are becoming increasingly popular in Britain.
A clear distinction must be drawn between actions requested by an Advance Directive, and active euthanasia, or "mercy killing". A doctor who took a positive step — such as giving a lethal injection — to help a patient die would, as the law stands, be guilty of murder or aiding and abetting suicide, depending On the circum- stances.
An Advance Directive, however, requests only passive euthanasia: the withholding of medical treatment aimed solely at sustaining the life of a patient who is terminally ill or a vegetable (in a vegetative state). The definition of medical treatment, in such circumstances, Can include food and water.
The enforceability of the Advance Directive Stems from the notion, long accepted in English law, that a person who is both old enough to make an informed decision and compos mentis, is entitled to refuse any medical treatment offered by a doctor, even if that refusal leads to the person's death. A doctor who forces treatment on a patient against his or her wishes is, therefore, guilty of an assault. Case law exists in the US and several EU countries that extends this right of autonomy over one's life to patients who write an Advance Directive refusing treatment and subsequently lose their reason. There is no reason, based on public policy or English case law, why an English court should treat previously made instructions any differently.
It will be a relief over the death of a friend or a relative if the friend or relative dies from ______.
A.a traffic accident
B.an acute infectious disease
C.heart attack
D.a three-year cancer
第1题
Among all the animals, dogs are the most ______ companions for human beings. (faith)
第2题
They also warn that these countries are among the most _________ to climate change.
Alax
Bvulnerable
Caddictive
Dnasty
第3题
A.most
B.perfect
C.having
D.site
第4题
In most circumstances, a speaker should avoid passing visual aids among the audience?()
第5题
A.consumed
B.resumed
C.assumed
D.presumed
第6题
A.whose
B.which
C.what
D.that
第7题
The most important play among Shakespeare's comedies is _____
AHamlet
BThe Twelfth Night
CThe Merchat of Venice
DThe Merchant of Venice
第8题
A.OVS
B.SVO
C.VSO
D.SOV
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“赏学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!